Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | darth_vaner | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
| Jeskai Oculus | crazymorango | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907 |
| Jeskai Oculus | phoenix_flame | 7-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | manohito | 6-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769901 |
| Jeskai Oculus | sixmp | 6-3 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Affinity , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Soldiers , Azorius Tempo , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Cauldron , Dimir Demons
Meta Performance Analysis
Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator ranks #299 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 72%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 72.8%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 7.84 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.0%. Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator has a win rate of 66.7%, making it 9.9% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bloodletter of Aclazotz | Creature — Vampire Demon | 5 | 66.7% | 3 |
| Unidentified Hovership | Artifact — Vehicle | 9 | 65.8% | 2 |
| Steel Seraph | Artifact Creature — Angel | 9 | 65.8% | 2 |
| Raise the Past | Sorcery | 8 | 63.2% | 2 |
| Archfiend of the Dross | Creature — Phyrexian Demon | 5 | 60.0% | 3 |
| Knight of Grace | Creature — Human Knight | 6 | 57.1% | 0 |
| Ajani, Caller of the Pride | Legendary Planeswalker — Ajani | 5 | 57.0% | 0 |
| Protect the Negotiators | Instant | 16 | 55.9% | 3 |
| Regal Bunnicorn | Creature — Rabbit Unicorn | 11 | 53.9% | 3 |
| Warden of the Inner Sky | Creature — Human Soldier | 13 | 53.3% | 4 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 9 | 70.2% | 70.9% | -0.8% |
| Kitsa, Otterball Elite | Legendary Creature — Otter Wizard | 2 | 6 | 69.0% | 70.8% | -1.8% |
| Inti, Seneschal of the Sun | Legendary Creature — Human Knight | 2 | 10 | 68.8% | 71.3% | -2.5% |
| Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 3 | 12 | 64.7% | 67.8% | -3.1% |
| Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 17 | 66.7% | 69.8% | -3.2% |
| Marauding Mako | Creature — Shark Pirate | 1 | 16 | 66.7% | 70.0% | -3.4% |
| Recommission | Sorcery | 2 | 11 | 67.6% | 71.3% | -3.7% |
| Abhorrent Oculus | Creature — Eye | 3 | 16 | 66.7% | 70.5% | -3.8% |
| Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 2 | 16 | 66.7% | 70.6% | -3.9% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 15 | 67.3% | 71.3% | -4.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 57 | 2.7% | 52.5% |
| Azorius Flash | 46 | 20.4% | 55.6% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 26 | 8.6% | 50.3% |
| Azorius Glyph | 7 | 6.1% | 65.9% |
| Jeskai Convoke | 6 | 1.1% | 26.2% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.